California politician wants to censor online maps

March 28, 2009
A photograph issued by online mapping firm GeoEye-1. An elected California official wants the state known for Internet technology to blur images of schools, hospitals, government buildings and houses of worship in online maps.

An elected California official wants the state known for Internet technology to blur images of schools, hospitals, government buildings and houses of worship in online maps.

Southern California assemblyman Joel Anderson, a Republican, is backing a bill that would call for Internet mapping services to obscure such images or face daily fines of 250,000 dollars.

"Sensitive areas that could be potential soft targets for terrorists or hate crime perpetrators should not be available on the internet at a level of detail that poses a serious security risk," Anderson said Friday in an email to AFP.

He cited reports that pictures of former prime minister Tony Blair's home in London were recently removed from a feature in that provides users with 360-degree images of locations.

Anderson also said that Street View pictures of the House of Commons and other British government buildings were "blacked out."

Google has said publically that it does not take it on itself to edit images at its free online mapping service but that it does delete or obscure pictures at requests from property owners or officials running government facilities.

"In the United Kingdom, Google blacked out key government buildings from their Street View service," Anderson said.

"I have proposed a bill, AB 255, that would require all Internet mapping sites to take the same precautions with California government buildings, places of worship, schools and hospitals."

The bill, which Anderson introduced in February, would make it state law for online mapping services to blur images of designated "sensitive" locations, whether the pictures were taken at street level, from the air, or by satellites.

Anderson concedes that his fledgling bill needs to be refined, but argues that it is part of a growing international trend by governments to curb risks of terrorists using online mapping services to plan attacks.

The official maintains that he is not opposed to online maps, but believes only those up to evil deeds are interested in details such as positioning of entrances, windows and air ducts.

(c) 2009 AFP

Explore further: India says no to Google Earth's peering

Related Stories

India says no to Google Earth's peering

March 10, 2006

Concerned over distinct satellite images of its strategic installations that Google makes available online, India has decided to mask some of the sensitive images itself.

NASA joins Google in mapping the moon

September 19, 2007

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration has joined with Google Inc. in producing new higher-resolution lunar imagery and maps.

Google removes street images over privacy complaints

March 20, 2009

US software giant Google said Friday it had removed several images from its Street View software, which allows web surfers to view parts of 25 British cities, after users raised privacy concerns.

Recommended for you

The ethics of robot love

November 25, 2015

There was to have been a conference in Malaysia last week called Love and Sex with Robots but it was cancelled. Malaysian police branded it "illegal" and "ridiculous". "There is nothing scientific about sex with robots," ...

Nevada researchers trying to turn roadside weed into biofuel

November 26, 2015

Three decades ago, a University of Nevada researcher who obtained one of the first U.S. Energy Department grants to study the potential to turn plants into biofuels became convinced that a roadside weed—curly top gumweed—was ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

4 / 5 (4) Mar 28, 2009
Should probably remove listings in phone books for these places too. And addresses, wherever those may be printed. Sure, it might be hard finding your government offices and schools but atleast the children will be safe from these terrorists.
5 / 5 (2) Mar 29, 2009
Should also make sure that all online photo galleries, such as Flickr, Picasaweb, etc, have to blur photos of these places.

Give me a break, this isn't about making us safer, it's about making us -feel- safer.
1 / 5 (2) Mar 29, 2009
Is it possible for us to force California to secede from the union and go their own way?
not rated yet Mar 29, 2009
nah...just guvernate it!
not rated yet Mar 29, 2009
Don't forget the paper maps sold everywhere.

Maybe the 360 degree street views I can understand a little. But blurring a top view of the these?

Fine just search google maps for blurred areas and then go check it out. It is most likely a soft target. Individual life is cheap to terrorists so they would have a guy sit and film/record the target. LIKE THEY HAVE DONE IN THE PAST.

Please don't let politicians try to do terrorist profiling.
not rated yet Mar 29, 2009
I was born at Lackland AFB. What if I wanted to look at my place of birth. So is that going to make me a terrorist because of that. I lived at Scott AFB in the 80's too, and Nellis and....
not rated yet Mar 30, 2009
How typical of California. There are at least 50 other ways for anyone to get the same information. Maybe if the politicians spent more time on important and positive things, the state would not be in the predicament it is. This is not about safety, it is about politics. Quit the censorship for headlines.
5 / 5 (1) Mar 30, 2009
Too late the barn doors open and the data is
already out there.

To stop it now is only going to hurt the good guys.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.