Physicists resolve a paradox of quantum theory

Jan 14, 2009

University of Toronto quantum physicists Jeff Lundeen and Aephraim Steinberg have shown that Hardy's paradox, a proposal that has confounded physicists for over a decade, can be confirmed and ultimately resolved, a task which had seemingly been impossible to perform.

"For nearly a century, the widespread interpretation of quantum mechanics suggests that everything is uncertain until it is observed, and that observation inevitably alters reality," says Professor Steinberg. "However, in the 1990s, a technique known as 'interaction-free measurement' seemed to promise the ability to 'see without looking,' as a Scientific American article put it at the time. But when Lucien Hardy proposed that one could never reliably make inferences about past events which hadn't been directly observed, a paradox emerged which suggested that whenever one attempted to reason about the past in this way they would be led into error."

Over the course of nearly two years of work, Steinberg and then-student Jeff Lundeen, now a research associate at the National Research Council of Canada, built a complicated quantum optical experiment and developed new theoretical tools. In essence, they combined Hardy's Paradox with a new theory known as weak measurement proposed by Tel Aviv University physicist Yakir Aharonov, showing that in one sense, one can indeed talk about the past, resolving the paradox. Weak measurement is a tool whereby the presence of a detector is less than the level of uncertainty around what is being measured, so that there is an imperceptible impact on the experiment. "We found that all of the seemingly paradoxical conclusions in Hardy's Paradox can, in fact, be experimentally verified," says Steinberg, "but that the use of weak measurement removes the contradiction."

"Until recently, it seemed impossible to carry out Hardy's proposal in practice, let alone to confirm or resolve the paradox," he says. "We have finally been able to do so, and to apply Aharonov's methods to the problem, showing that there is a way, even in quantum mechanics, in which one can quite consistently discuss past events even after they are over and done. Weak measurement finds what is there without disturbing it."

The findings are published online today in an article titled "Experimental Joint Weak Measurement on a Photon Pair as a Probe of Hardy's Paradox" in the January 16 issue of the Physical Review of Letters at link.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v102/e020404 .

Source: University of Toronto

Explore further: A 'movie' of ultrafast rotating molecules at a hundred billion per second

Related Stories

Solving the Hox Specificity Paradox

Jan 22, 2015

The remarkable diversity of anatomical features along the body axis of animals—the differences between the head, the thorax and the abdomen, for example—is determined by proteins in the Hox family. But ...

Are weak values quantum? Don't bet on it

Sep 24, 2014

(Phys.org) —New work asserts that a key technique used to probe quantum systems may not be so quantum after all, according to Perimeter postdoctoral researcher Joshua Combes and his colleague Christopher ...

Recommended for you

Extreme lab at European X-ray laser XFEL is a go

Jul 02, 2015

The Helmholtz Senate has given the green light for the Association's involvement in the Helmholtz International Beamline (HIB), a new kind of experimentation station at the X-ray laser European XFEL in Hamburg, ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

podizzle
3.5 / 5 (2) Jan 14, 2009
wow this time machine prototype is taking forever. (posted from the future with my weak measurement computer)
Pointedly
4.2 / 5 (6) Jan 14, 2009
Hey, podizzle. I thought I felt that I was being weakly measured...but I was uncertain.
el_gramador
not rated yet Jan 15, 2009
Okay guys enough with the puns, we don't want to hit another heisenberg.
Alexa
5 / 5 (1) Jan 24, 2009
By AWT the particles of reality are formed by nested density fluctuations of hypothetical particle field, so called an Aether. The measurement mean, the surface undulations of particles will get synchronized with those of observer (i.e. entangled), so that the relative component of mutual motion dissapears (collapse of wave function).

The weak measurement would mean, only undulations on certain level of nested density fluctuations will get synchronized.

For example, it's quite probable, if we succeede in particle localization by it's own gravity field at distance, such subtle observation wouldn't affect the actual particle spin or other basic properties at all, which would allow deterministic intepretation of quantum mechanics - at least up to certain level.

Was such explanation clear for you?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.