Flapping wing vehicle improves on the a helicopter

December 11, 2008 By Bill Steele
Four sets of small flapping wings and stabilizing sails give the vehicle the ability to right itself from any position, something even helicopters can't do.

(PhysOrg.com) -- Since the days of Leonardo da Vinci people have tried to build machines that fly with flapping wings like a bird or an insect. Even in the jet age the idea remains attractive because such machines could be more maneuverable than fixed-wing aircraft, and at small sizes would use less energy to hover than helicopters.

Many of these so-called "ornithopters" have been built. Some of them fly well when moving forward, but so far, few do a good job of hovering in place. Our computers still can't match the complex feedback and control systems in the tiny brains of birds and bugs.

But Cornell researchers have come up with a simple, inexpensive flapping wing vehicle that hovers as well as a hummingbird or a bumblebee -- and might eventually be made just as small. Potential applications include surveillance, artificial pollination and even toys.

The vehicle -- built by students Floris Van Breugel and William Regan, working with Hod Lipson, Cornell associate professor of mechanical and aerospace engineering -- needs no complex control system because it is "passively stable." Tip it over and it naturally rights itself like a buoy in water. It can even be started upside down and will recover, something few conventional aircraft, including helicopters, can do. The device is described in an article in the December 2008 issue of IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

The prototype, about 2 feet high, uses four pairs of flexible flapping wings arranged at the corners of a box-kite-shaped stabilizing sail, driven by tiny rotary motors that move bent crankshafts to produce a flapping motion. The wings are made of thin polyethylene film stretched over a veined plastic frame of slightly thicker polyethylene, not unlike the structure of many insect wings. The wings are attached by carbon fiber rods that flex to increase the length of each flap and store elastic energy like springs. With a body made of laser-cut balsa wood and packing foam, the vehicle weighs just 24.2 grams (a bit less than one ounce), including batteries.

The design is highly scalable, according to Lipson, and the next step will be to make smaller versions, perhaps down to fly size, where motors might be replaced by piezoelectric actuators.

It was once a standing joke that according to aerodynamic theory bumblebees can't fly. What this really meant was that the theory needed to be refined, and a number of scientists have been working on it, allowing for the complex vortices that form at the leading and trailing edges of insect wings as they move both up and down and forward and back. Studies of live insects have shown that their wings change shape as they move to take advantage of these effects. Van Breugel took all this into account in his design, creating flexible wings with a carefully tailored shape that warps through the flapping cycle in response to air pressure and inertia to get maximum lift with minimum battery power.

Van Breugel is now a Ph.D. candidate at the California Institute of Technology, and Regan is a Ph.D. candidate at the University of California-Berkeley.

Along with practical applications of the technology, the researchers said they hoped the work would provide further insight into the mechanisms underlying the flight of insects and hummingbirds.

Provided by Cornell University

Explore further: Bats use weighty wings to land upside down

Related Stories

Bats use weighty wings to land upside down

November 16, 2015

Compared to birds and insects, bats have heavy wings for their body size. Those comparatively cumbersome flappers might seem a detriment to maneuverability, but new research shows that bats' extra wing mass makes possible ...

Recommended for you

The ethics of robot love

November 25, 2015

There was to have been a conference in Malaysia last week called Love and Sex with Robots but it was cancelled. Malaysian police branded it "illegal" and "ridiculous". "There is nothing scientific about sex with robots," ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (2) Dec 12, 2008
the problem with flapping wings is that they arent efficient, which is why rotary wings are used, they dont have to break and restablish kinetic engery with every flap of the wing.
5 / 5 (5) Dec 12, 2008
There is a trick that humming birds and a few others use. The wings actually move in a figure 8 pattern and create lift on the upswing, and the rounded bottoms of the flapping motion preserves a lot of the momentum of the wing.

Very efficient for an animal, still not so much for a mechanical system.
not rated yet Dec 12, 2008
If I'm not mistaken the battery is at the bottom, naturally leading to stability. The question of lift is whether or not vortex capturing systems can be made efficient. I'm not sure that we know everything about the subject yet, nor am I sure that, ipso facto, moving wings are inefficient when properly designed. There's so much more to be discovered in the Universe.
not rated yet Dec 15, 2008
Helicopters and hummingbirds take advantage of a spike in aerodynamic lift created by a transient angle of attack(the oscillating wing/rotor rapidly change angle of attack) i think wsbriggs was referring the the vortex's shed during this transient lift process.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.