Why C is not G: How we identify letters

November 25, 2008

The next time you are reading a book, or even as you read this article, consider the words that you are seeing. How do you recognize these words? Substantial research has shown that while reading, we recognize words by their letters and not by the general shape of the word. However, it was largely unknown how we differentiate one letter from another.

Psychologist Daniel Fiset from the University of Victoria and his colleagues investigated which features of letters are necessary for their identification. In these experiments, the researchers used the "Bubbles" technique, in which randomly sampled areas of a letter were shown to volunteers. The researchers then evaluated which areas of each of the 26 letters of the Roman alphabet were crucial for letter recognition.

The results, reported in the November issue of Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, reveal that the most important features for identifying both upper and lower case letters are the points where the letters end, also known as line terminations. The presence of horizontal lines in the letters was the second most important feature for letter recognition.

To compare the human volunteers' use of letter features with optimal use of the provided information, the researchers developed an "ideal-observer" model, which used all of the visual information that was available for letter identification. There were some notable differences comparing the human results to those of the ideal observer. For instance, the most useful feature of letters for the ideal observer were vertical lines and curves opening up and not line terminations. The authors note that the human visual system is believed to be specialized in the processing of line terminations, which allow us to recognize and distinguish surrounding objects. They suggest that the great importance of terminations for letter recognition results from an interaction between the relative usefulness of this feature and a strong natural tendency of the human visual system to encode it.

The researchers conclude that these findings may lead to the development of fonts which could result in improved and faster letter recognition, both for normal readers and individuals with letter-by-letter dyslexia.

Source: Association for Psychological Science

Explore further: China dreams of electric sheep at robot conference

Related Stories

Error sends healthcare termination notices

June 30, 2006

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana is blaming its computer system for an error that resulted in 11,000 people receiving healthcare termination notices.

Science journal letter highlights salmon vulernability

August 6, 2015

Simon Fraser University scientist Jonathan Moore has authored new research suggesting that a proposed controversial terminal to load fossil fuels in the Skeena River estuary has more far-reaching risks than previously recognized.

Recommended for you

How the finch changes its tune

August 3, 2015

Like top musicians, songbirds train from a young age to weed out errors and trim variability from their songs, ultimately becoming consistent and reliable performers. But as with human musicians, even the best are not machines. ...

Machine Translates Thoughts into Speech in Real Time

December 21, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- By implanting an electrode into the brain of a person with locked-in syndrome, scientists have demonstrated how to wirelessly transmit neural signals to a speech synthesizer. The "thought-to-speech" process ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

2 / 5 (1) Nov 25, 2008
or perhaps an entirely new set of characters to replace the roman ones
not rated yet Nov 25, 2008
Omnitheo, I would say Symbols and not Characters...
not rated yet Nov 25, 2008
How about Kanji-based Esperanto?
not rated yet Nov 25, 2008
Yes dbren you are right. They should test this with kanji too. Lots of line terminations in each stroke...
not rated yet Dec 01, 2008

For instance, the most useful feature of letters for the ideal observer were vertical lines and curves opening up and not line terminations

Most useful based on what criteria?

Letters are defined by line terminations not by curves which is why we use them. Curves differ between font types while positions of line terminations are much more constant.

Another reason is that when comparing normal lines to line terminations the difference takes a larger proportion of detail area then is the case when you compare lines to curves. This is especially true for small fonts.

Take a look at this font for example, curves are hardly there while line terminations are easy to spot.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.