Speed matters for ice-shelf breaking

November 27, 2008

It won't help the Titanic, but a newly derived, simple law may help scientists improve their climate models and glaciologists predict where icebergs will calve off from their parent ice sheets, according to a team of Penn State researchers.

"To predict the future of the ice sheet and to understand the past, we have to put the information into a computer," says Richard B. Alley, the Evan Pugh professor of geosciences. "The models we have do not currently have any way to figure out where the big ice sheets end and where the ice calves off to form icebergs."

Ice sheets, such as those in Antarctica and Greenland, spread under their own weight and flow off land over the oceans. The Ross Ice Shelf in Antarctica floats for as much as 500 miles over the ocean before the edges begin to break and create icebergs. Other ice shelves only edge over the water for a mile or two.

"The problem of when things break is a really hard problem because there is so much variability," says Alley. "Anyone who has dropped a coffee cup knows this. Sometimes the coffee cup breaks and sometimes it bounces."

The coffee cup's breaking depends on what it hits and where it hits, but the most important variable is the distance the cup falls or is thrown. Below a certain distance, the cup will always remain intact, while above a certain distance, it will always break; for in-between distances, the results are variable.

For iceberg calving, the important variable – the one that accounts for the largest portion of when the iceberg breaks -- is the rate at which ice shelves spread, the team reports in today's (Nov. 28) issue of Science. When ice shelves spread, they crack because of the stresses of spreading. If they spread slowly, those cracks do not propagate through the entire shelf and the shelf remains intact. If the shelf spreads rapidly, the cracks propagate through the shelf and pieces break off.

"Spreading explains most of what is observed on the ice sheet," says Alley. "However, the equations come out a little better if we include a few other things."

These factors are the width of the ice shelf and the thickness. With a narrow shelf between two ridges, for example, the sides hold back the ice movement, slowing the overall movement and making it harder to break the ice. Thicker ice shelves spread more quickly so this affects the location of ice calving as well.

The basic equation for ice calving is the rate of spreading times the width of the shelf times the thickness times a constant. The researchers realize that this does not capture the totality of variation in the ice calving process but does account for a large percentage of the variability.

Source: Penn State

Related Stories

Climate change leaves its mark on the sea floor? Maybe not, study says

October 16, 2015

The texture of the ocean floor is determined by the enormous stretching and cracking that takes place at the mid-ocean ridge, where tectonic plates are pulling apart and magma is rising to form new sea floor. On either side ...

Massive crevasses and bendable ice affect stability of Antarctic ice shelf, research team finds

December 7, 2012

Gaping crevasses that penetrate upward from the bottom of the largest remaining ice shelf on the Antarctic Peninsula make it more susceptible to collapse, according to University of Colorado Boulder researchers who spent ...

Satellite observes rapid ice shelf disintegration in Antarctic

April 5, 2012

One of the satellite's first observations following its launch on 1 March 2002 was of break-up of a main section of the Larsen B ice shelf in Antarctica – when 3200 sq km of ice disintegrated within a few days due to ...

Ice core 'dipstick' indicates West Antarctic ice has thinned less than believed

March 23, 2005

Rising sea levels 20,000 years ago, as the last ice age was beginning to wane, often are attributed in part to melting in West Antarctica. But in a new study led by University of Washington researchers, an ice core of 1,000 ...

Warming seas and melting ice sheets

August 27, 2015

Sea level rise is a natural consequence of the warming of our planet.

Greenland and Antarctic ice sheet melting, rate unknown

February 16, 2009

The Greenland and Antarctica ice sheets are melting, but the amounts that will melt and the time it will take are still unknown, according to Richard Alley, Evan Pugh professor of geosciences, Penn State.

Recommended for you

New paper shows degree of impact of corporate messaging on public perception of global warming

December 1, 2015

(Phys.org)—Justin Farrell of Yale University has published another paper as part of his research into the ways that large corporations are using disinformation campaigns to confuse the public regarding global warming and ...

Revealed—the single event that made complex life possible in our oceans

December 1, 2015

The catalyst that allowed the evolution of complex life in Earth's oceans has been identified by a University of Bristol researcher. Up to 800 million years ago, the Earth's oceans were deprived of oxygen. It was only when ...

Research reveals the reality of runaway ice loss in Antarctica

November 28, 2015

By studying rocks at different elevations beside the East Antarctic Ice Sheet (EAIS), the team concluded that a period of rapid glacier thinning occurred in the recent geological past, and persisted for several centuries.

Rapid plankton growth in ocean seen as sign of carbon dioxide loading

November 26, 2015

A microscopic marine alga is thriving in the North Atlantic to an extent that defies scientific predictions, suggesting swift environmental change as a result of increased carbon dioxide in the ocean, a study led a by Johns ...

Can Paris pledges avert severe climate change?

November 26, 2015

More than 190 countries are meeting in Paris next week to create a durable framework for addressing climate change and to implement a process to reduce greenhouse gases over time. A key part of this agreement would be the ...

Nuclear waste storage sites in rock salt may be more vulnerable than previously thought

November 26, 2015

Research from The University of Texas at Austin shows that rock salt, used by Germany and the United States as a subsurface container for radioactive waste, might not be as impermeable as thought or as capable of isolating ...

Noein
2.9 / 5 (7) Nov 28, 2008
What?? An article that mentions "climate model" hasn't been bombarded yet by global warming denialism propagandists?? I'm SHOCKED.
Velanarris
2.8 / 5 (6) Nov 28, 2008
What?? An article that mentions "climate model" hasn't been bombarded yet by global warming denialism propagandists?? I'm SHOCKED.
We figured we'd let you make an ass of yourself first. Now that thats out of the way.

No one cares about ice shelves which no one prior to 2002 can substantiate as being a permanent structure in the glaciated regions. Some of the prior "fallen" ice shelfs are currently regrowing, as well as their parent ice sheets thickening.

Perhaps the decadal ocean temperature ocillation is responsible.
GrayMouser
2.5 / 5 (6) Nov 28, 2008
As with any computer model, Garbage-In=Gospel-Out.
mikiwud
3 / 5 (2) Dec 01, 2008
Why no mention of tidal forces on ice shelves?
On high tides the extra "floating effect" would cause an upward pressure compared to low tide. This would stress any weak points, especially at times of higher tidal range.
Also, during storms these stresses could be increased.
If speed of growth is relevant then tidal forces may create the breaking point.
I may be wrong, but if this has not been factored in, Why! It seems to be a major consideration.