Thumbs up -- a tiny ancestral remnant lends developmental edge to humans

September 4, 2008

Subtle genetic changes that confer an evolutionary advantage upon a species, such as the dexterity characteristic of the human hand, while difficult to detect and even harder to reproduce in a model system, have nevertheless generated keen interest amongst evolutionary biologists. In findings published online in the September 5 edition of the journal Science, researchers from the U.S. Department of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and their collaborators, have uncovered a specifically human 13-nucelotide change concealed in the vast three-billion-letter landscape of the human genome.

Their experiments reveal this stretch of DNA to be a recently evolved regulator of gee expression that, when introduced into a mouse embryo system, influence the molecular machinery to yield human limb and thumb development patterns.

The study reinforces the conclusion that certain regions of genomes—those which are conserved across many species over evolutionary time and do not encode genes—can have a powerful regulatory influence on gene expression or the production of proteins.

"The study points to how human nucleotide substitutions can alter the regulation of genes in humans distinct from that of non-human primates, such as chimps," said one of the study's corresponding/senior authors Eddy Rubin, Director of Berkeley Lab's Genomics Division and the U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute. "This highlights a strategy that could be applied across the genome to understand at a molecular level what leads to differences between humans and non-human primates."

The goal of the experiment was not to produce mice with human fingers. Rather, an indirect assay was employed to test the expression readout of a single human genetic fragment and compare it with the chimp version. The strategy, which links a color-inducing reporter gene when expression is activated, turns the targeted tissue blue, as it did in the published case. This led to the conclusion that the human-versus-chimp pattern of activation was different, consistent with the fast evolution of the human sequence, which may also give rise to a new function.

Previously published work from the Rubin lab by co-authors Shyam Prabhakar (now at the Genome Institute of Singapore), James Noonan (now at the Yale University School of Medicine), and postdoctoral fellows describes a global survey they conducted of genomes—human, chimpanzee, rhesus macaque, mouse, rat, and dog. They screened across these species to find the most conserved regions, but where humans had many more changes relative to the others. By comparing the occurrence of these features, they were seeking to home in on evidence of positive selection—sequence changes that evolve more rapidly since the human and chimp paths split six million years ago.

When queried about the extent of variation between humans and chimpanzees on a DNA level, the prevailing consensus amongst researchers is that humans are only about one percent different from our furrier friends—meaning one changed letter of code in one hundred nucleotides. It has long been postulated that the differences are not a consequence of protein-encoding changes, but must be attributed to a more cryptic mechanism because there are not enough sequence changes to account for the obvious differences.

Building on pioneering work in the Rubin lab on the identification and characterization of these conserved noncoding sequences and the changes they induce in the genome the researchers generated a long list of such conserved elements. Using what is known as the "surprisal" test, a statistical tool for determining whether a particular event occurs at a rate greater than chance, they uncovered such a feature, dubbed human-accelerated conserved noncoding sequence 1 (HACNS1). Following the hypothesis that this was a gene regulatory sequence, they took this 546-base pair element, one that they determined has changed the most in humans relative to the other species over time, and plugged it into their mouse transgenic assay. They discovered that the human sequence enhances gene expression in limb and brain—a gain of function.

The next question that they asked was if the human and chimp elements have sequence differences, why do they still function similarly. They took the chimp version, placed it in an identical construct in mice and found that the human and chimp sequences have very different expression properties.

"Our results led us to believe that HACNS1 has contributed to uniquely human aspects of digit and limb patterning," Rubin said. "We suspect the gain of function in HACNS1 may have influenced the evolution of these or other human limb features by altering the expression of nearby genes during limb development."

The researchers have yet to define the precise molecular mechanism by which the substitutions in HACNS1 confer the human expression patterns. "To get a more complete picture of our HACNS1 factors into human morphological evolution will require additional studies," Rubin said.

"If this really is deterministic, you should see some type of change. But it will be a long, hard path forward," according to Rubin.

Source: Joint Genome Institute

Explore further: Ancient viral molecules essential for human development, researchers say

Related Stories

The corn snake genome sequenced for the first time

November 24, 2015

Among the 5 000 existing species of mammals, more than 100 have their genome sequenced, whereas the genomes of only 9 species of reptiles (among 10 000 species) are available to the scientific community. This is the reason ...

New form of mRNA regulation characterized

November 23, 2015

RNA, once thought to be a mere middleman between DNA and protein, is now recognized as the stage at which a host of regulatory processes can act to allow for flexibility in gene expression and thus the functions of cells ...

Adapting to -70C in Siberia: A tale of Yakutian horses

November 23, 2015

From an evolutionary perspective it happened almost overnight. In less than 800 years Yakutian horses adapted to the extremely cold temperatures found in the environments of eastern Siberia. The adaptive process involved ...

Complex grammar of the genomic language

November 9, 2015

A new study from Sweden's Karolinska Institutet shows that the 'grammar' of the human genetic code is more complex than that of even the most intricately constructed spoken languages in the world. The findings, published ...

Recommended for you

A common mechanism for human and bird sound production

November 27, 2015

When birds and humans sing it sounds completely different, but now new research reported in the journal Nature Communications shows that the very same physical mechanisms are at play when a bird sings and a human speaks.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Sep 04, 2008
4 / 5 (1) Sep 05, 2008
I want to explore that 'gee expression'. Is this the genetic explanation for humor?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.