Hospitals could reduce unnecessary tests for cardiac diagnostic imaging

Sep 12, 2008

Hospitals that perform cardiac nuclear stress testing under published national practice guidelines could reduce unnecessary testing and, potentially costs, according to a Henry Ford Hospital study.

The study looked at 375 patients who underwent nuclear stress testing at Henry Ford and showed that in the majority of cases, 90 percent, physicians ordered the diagnostic imaging test appropriately using the updated 2007 Appropriateness Criteria of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology (ACNC) and American College of Cardiology.

However, researchers also found that 21 patients should not have received the test because their patient profile and assessment didn't meet the test criteria under the guidelines. While these patients were considered low risk for nuclear testing, none required additional testing such as a cardiac catheterization and 95 percent of the scans in the group turned up normal.

Karthik Ananth, M.D., a Henry Ford cardiologist and the study's senior author, and cardiology fellow Natesh Lingam will present the findings Friday, Sept. 12 at the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology Conference in Boston.

While the Henry Ford study did not look at cost, researchers theorize there is potential for savings based on their findings. Further study will be required to determine the cost analysis, researchers say.

"We believe there is potential for substantial savings provided hospitals closely adhere to these test-appropriateness criteria for cardiac nuclear testing," says Dr. Ananth.

"When followed, these criteria help physicians ensure the most effective use of cardiac nuclear testing and provide them simple clinical tools to filter out low-risk patients in whom unnecessary testing can be avoided."

These criteria were developed by an expert panel of physicians in response to a Medicare Payment Advisory Commission report showing that cardiac imaging services rose twice the rate of growth of other physician services from 1999-2003. Based originally on existing medical evidence and the most common clinical reasons for ordering stress testing, the criteria were published in 2005 and updated two years later to guide physicians to use nuclear testing more responsibly and cost effectively.

A cardiac nuclear test is a non-invasive procedure that measures arterial blood flow to the heart during physical or chemical stress. When compared to blood flow during rest, the test reflects imbalances of blood flow to the heart's left ventricular muscle tissue – the part of the heart that performs the greatest amount of work pumping blood.

Henry Ford performs about 4,000 cardiac nuclear tests annually, among the lowest in Michigan. Roughly 8 million nuclear tests are performed nationally, nearly double from 10 years ago. Patients are exposed to a small amount of radiation during the four-hour test, which costs about $4,000. Most insurance plans pay for the test.

In the study, Henry Ford researchers evaluated the practice patterns of their own cardiologists and non-cardiologists who ordered a cardiac nuclear test for patients between January-March 2007. The goal was to determine whether physicians adhered to the 52 criteria outlining when a test is appropriate or inappropriate.

The criteria aid physicians in identifying whether a patient should receive the nuclear test based on their medical profile. Of the 52, 27 indicators are listed for appropriate testing, 13 indicators for inappropriate testing and 12 indicators for uncertain, meaning testing may be acceptable but that additional research is needed to determine these criteria are appropriate or inappropriate.

Source: Henry Ford Health System

Explore further: Applying visual techniques to med school lessons

Related Stories

5 pelicans, 1 sea lion rescued in Santa Barbara oil spill

36 minutes ago

Team members from the Oiled Wildlife Care Network at UC Davis have joined crews responding to the oil spill in Santa Barbara County. They are coordinating the wildlife response effort as part of the unified ...

Recommended for you

European court to rule on right-to-die case

17 hours ago

Europe's human rights court will on June 5 rule on whether a man in a vegetative state can be taken off life support, a case that has ignited a fierce euthanasia debate in France, a spokesman said Thursday.

Mechanical ventilation associated with long-term disability

May 19, 2015

Critically ill patients who have been mechanically ventilated for more than seven days are at greatly increased risk for functional impairment and mortality at one year following discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU), ...

User comments : 0

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.