Bleeding-heart jetsetters spell bad news for climate

September 1, 2008

The emergence of a new generation of ‘bleeding-heart jetsetters’ has disturbing implications for the UK’s spiralling emissions from air travel, according to new research by the University of Exeter. The results of the research by the School of Geography, Archaeology and Earth Resources and University of Exeter Business School were presented by Dr Stewart Barr at the Royal Geographical Society with IBG Annual Conference.

According to a survey of over 200 people, along with focus groups and in-depth interviews, even the most committed environmentalists – identified by green trademarks such as shopping ethically, installing water and energy saving appliances and recycling – would not be prepared to accept extra ‘green taxes’ and are deeply sceptical of the carbon offsetting schemes designed to mitigate them.

Indeed, of those questioned, 59% were against the introduction of further taxes on air travel, whilst just 15% of those questioned had used carbon offsetting. The largest group identified from the survey, the ‘eco-hypocrites’ – those who operate green households yet also choose to fly – justified their jaunts by suggesting that recycling, using energy saving lightbulbs and buying ethically-sourced groceries were sufficient to ‘trade off’ the impact of their holidays abroad.

Even the most ‘eco-conscious’ were determined to keep flying regardless of environmental cost, believing that taxes and offsetting would have little impact on the reducing emissions from flying, the researchers found.

Dr Stewart Barr of the University of Exeter’s School of Geography, Archaeology and Earth Resources said: “Ironically, our research shows that even the most bleeding-heart jetsetters aren’t willing to reduce their flying habits significantly, despite their supposedly impeccable green credentials. Low-cost air travel has become embedded into our culture here in the UK, so trying to change everyone’s behaviour, when even the most eco-conscious amongst us have very little trust in the ability of either green taxes or carbon offsetting to reduce the impact of flying, will be a formidable challenge.”

Provided by University of Exeter

Explore further: Melting glaciers feed Antarctic food chain

Related Stories

Melting glaciers feed Antarctic food chain

August 11, 2015

Nutrient-rich water from melting Antarctic glaciers nourishes the ocean food chain, creating feeding "hot spots" in large gaps in the sea ice, according to a new study.

Researcher proposes a new energy efficiency measurement

July 2, 2015

Rick Larrick has been on a crusade to help people better understand how much energy they use. A professor with Duke University's Fuqua School of Business, in 2008 Larrick and Fuqua colleague Jack Soll proposed a gallons ...

Music festivals go cleaner, greener

March 3, 2015

Every summer, tens of thousands of people across Australia revel in live outdoor music, staying for a day or pitching their tents for a weekend. When the music dies, however, what's left may be less appealing – a churned-up ...

Recommended for you

Ice sheets may be more resilient than thought

September 3, 2015

Sea level rise poses one of the biggest threats to human systems in a globally warming world, potentially causing trillions of dollars' worth of damages to flooded cities around the world. As surface temperatures rise, ice ...

Clues from ancient Maya reveal lasting impact on environment

September 3, 2015

Evidence from the tropical lowlands of Central America reveals how Maya activity more than 2,000 years ago not only contributed to the decline of their environment but continues to influence today's environmental conditions, ...

5 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

TheRogue
2.6 / 5 (5) Sep 01, 2008
Wow! with a headline like that, the entire article becomes instantly slanted. And it is. "Bleeding heart" has become such a pejorative term I wonder why the editors didn't catch it. If this is supposedly a "scientific" list, don't we deserve better than such tacky editorializing by headline writers?
dirk_bruere
3.4 / 5 (5) Sep 01, 2008
The reason is simple: we do not believe "environmental taxes" will actually be used to benefit the environment. In fact, they are just another excuse for raising tax in general ie those politicians are lying b*astards
GrayMouser
5 / 5 (3) Sep 01, 2008
The sordid truth comes out.
Sophos
4.3 / 5 (3) Sep 02, 2008
Wow! with a headline like that, the entire article becomes instantly slanted.


Wow there is actually a anti-liberal bias media out there somewhere!! Rogue welcome to the conservative view of the world.
MikeB
3.7 / 5 (3) Sep 02, 2008
I suppose even "bleeding hearts" realize that the UN and our own governments are not be trusted. They also, apparently, are beginning to see the truth. CO2 emissions are not harming the Earth. The scaremongering is having the opposite effect.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.