Researchers turn one form of adult mouse cell directly into another

August 27, 2008
In this immunofluorescent image of an adult mouse pancreas, exocrine cells into which three transcription factors have been inserted are displayed in green. The red areas in the image are insulin. The blue streaks are blood vessels, which are remodeled by and lie close to the new, insulin-producing beta cells. Image courtesy Joe Zhou, Melton Lab

( -- In a feat of biological prestidigitation likely to turn the field of regenerative medicine on its head, Harvard Stem Cell Institute (HSCI) co-director Doug Melton and post doctoral fellow Qiao "Joe" Zhou report having achieved what has long been a dream and ultimate goal of developmental biologists – directly turning one type of fully formed adult cell into another type of adult cell.

The Melton team reports in today's online edition of the journal Nature that, using a technique it is calling "direct reprogramming," the team is able to turn mouse exocrine cells, which make up about 95 percent of the pancreas, into precious and rare insulin-producing beta cells. These beta cells, which comrpise about one percent of the pancreas, are the cells that die off in Type I diabetes.

In addition to its value for the field of regenerative medicine, the work also is a major step forward toward eventually developing a treatment for Type II – and eventually Type I – diabetes, a treatment that might someday eliminate the need for patients to constantly monitor their blood sugar and take insulin-adjusting medications, or even insulin. It is important to note, however, that there are numerous scientific hurdles that lay ahead before a treatment could be tested in humans.

Melton, a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Investigator, has discussed the work in general terms at a few scientific meeting over the course of the last few months, and his talks have generated expressions of surprise from those who have heard them, or even heard about them.

George Q. Daley, immediate past president of the International Society for Stem Cell Research and a member of HSCI's Executive Committee, said Melton's findings are of a caliber that "will revolutionize what is already a revolutionary field."

Unlike the process involved in creating induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS), which have caused enormous excitement ever since their introduction two years ago by Japanese researcher Shinya Yamanaka, this direct reprogramming technique does not require turning adult cells into stem cells and then figuring out how to induce them to differentiate into a desired cell type. Melton emphasized, however, that direct reprogramming does not in any way eliminate the need for, or value of, work with iPS cells or human embryonic stem cells. "We need to attack problems from multiple angles," said Melton, stressing that his lab is using several approaches and will continue to work with iPS and hES cells.

Sir John Gurden, the internationally renowned developmental biologist under whom Melton did his graduate work at Oxford University and the first scientist to successfully clone an adult mammal - a frog, said that "What you really want is a missing cell type, one that is not functioning properly to be derived from something else. But you only want that cell type. So I think this is a really important step forward in exercising what people really wanted and showing how well it can work, by this gene over-expression procedure."

As is the case with all iPS work thus far, Melton's experiments involved using viruses to integrate the transcription factors into the target cells. Because of the risks that approach would pose to humans, the team is looking for chemicals that might effectively and, most important, safely replace the viruses.

Joan Brugge, Chair of the Department of Cell Biology at Harvard Medical School, said the new study "provides exciting new insights into yet another aspect of cell plasticity that was not appreciated previously and that offers great potential therapeutically. Direct reprogramming represents a more straight-forward strategy to treat diseases involving loss of function of specific cell populations than approaches requiring an intermediate embryonic stem cell," she said.

Whitehead Institute stem cell researcher Rudolf Jaenisch, who has heard one of Melton's presentations on the new work, said that there had previously been so much empty talk about supposedly successful direct reprogramming efforts that if anyone other than Doug Melton were publishing this report Jaenisch would view it quite skeptically.

In fact, even Melton was "more than a little surprised to find that we could use a combination of just three transcription factors to reprogram one cell type into another." He said that first author Joe Zhou's experiments "combined a systematic approach to identifying the relevant transcription factors, hard work, and a bit of luck."

Luck, serendipity, is virtually always a part of the process of scientific discovery. But the choice of transcription factors Ngn3, Pdx1, and MafA, while lucky, could hardly be said to have resulted from luck. Instead, it was the product of two years of repetitive lab work that began, Melton said, "by asking what genes you have to have turned on in the cell for it to become a beta cell.

"If you want to do reprogramming it doesn't take great insight to figure out that the key genes are transcription factors – the proteins that bind DNA and tell cells which genes to turn on and which to turn off," said Melton, the co-chairman of Harvard's new Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology.

Melton likened the the multi-step process a stem cell goes through during differentiation into a specific adult cell type to passing through a series of doors. "There are locks on all the doors," he said, "and the locks are transcription factors. We asked which ones are present in the beta cell, and that gave us 1,100 transcription factors to choose from. Eventually we learned that of the 1,100, only about 200 are actually expressed in cells that are involved in forming the pancreas.

"Next," Melton continued, "we decided that of the 200, we only cared about the ones that are expressed in the key part of the pancreas where the beta cells are – and that got us down to about 28. Then we did some lineage studies," he explained, "and we got it down to nine. Joe said, 'my best guess is it's these nine.' And he were right. It was a messy experiment, mixing all nine and injecting them into the pancreas. Then we found out that it got better and better as we removed one gene at a time from the nine, and eventually we found that it actually works best with three transcription factors – that six of them aren't that important. And that's the fun of science!" Melton said, a grin spreading across his face.

But back to serendipity for a moment:

Suppose the experiment hadn't worked with those nine transcription factors; what then? "If it hadn't worked with those nine, we'd probably have dropped the experiment and gone onto something else; there would have been just too many possible combinations of transcription factors to wade through," Melton said.

"We’re intrigued by the possibility that this approach, which has worked for pancreatic insulin-producing cells, could be more widely applied to many kind of cells, especially those that are lost in disease or following injury," Melton said. "And at the same time, we are exploring the possibility of using this general approach in a clinical context to make new beta cells for patients."


Provided by Harvard University

Explore further: Researchers achieve major breakthrough in cell reprogramming

Related Stories

Researchers achieve major breakthrough in cell reprogramming

September 30, 2010

( -- A group of Harvard Stem Cell Institute (HSCI) researchers has made so significant a leap forward in reprogramming human adult cells that HSCI co-director Doug Melton, who did not participate in the work, ...

Scientists create 20 disease-specific stem cell lines

August 7, 2008

( -- Harvard Stem Cell Institute researcher George Q. Daley, associate director of the Stem Cell Program at Children's Hospital Boston, has with HSCI colleagues Chad Cowan and Konrad Hochedlinger of Massachusetts ...

Scientists reveal key barrier to reprogramming human zygotes

October 6, 2011

(Medical Xpress) -- New research from Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) scientists pinpoints a biological barrier that has thus far slowed progress in creating disease-specific stem cell lines using a technique known ...

Human cardiac master stem cells identified

July 1, 2009

( -- Harvard Stem Cell Institute researchers at Massachusetts General Hospital have identified the earliest master human heart stem cell from human embryonic stem cells - ISL1+ progenitors - that give rise to ...

Recommended for you

Just a touch of skyrmions

October 13, 2015

Ancient memory devices such as handwriting were based on mechanical energy—but in the modern world they have given way to devices based generally on electrical manipulation.

Toyota promises better mileage and ride with Prius hybrid

October 13, 2015

Toyota Motor Corp. released details for its fourth-generation Prius on Tuesday, promising that improvements in the battery, engine, wind resistance and weight mean better mileage for the world's top-selling hybrid car.

What happens when your brain can't tell which way is up?

October 13, 2015

In space, there is no "up" or "down." That can mess with the human brain and affect the way people move and think in space. An investigation on the International Space Station seeks to understand how the brain changes in ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (3) Aug 27, 2008
This IS the BEST medical news I have heard in AGES!
5 / 5 (3) Aug 27, 2008
Wow, this is fantastic news! Bravo to Melton and his colleagues.
5 / 5 (1) Aug 27, 2008
*Human race to entropy laden universe* Boo-yah!
1 / 5 (2) Aug 28, 2008
"Sir John Gurden, the internationally renowned developmental biologist ... the first scientist to successfully clone an adult mammal - a frog,..."

Uhh... what? When did frogs become mammals?
Where's the fact checking here?
5 / 5 (1) Aug 28, 2008
Whist clearly a tremendous milestone it is a long way from being a solution. I am curious about longterm efficacy trials. Viruses have been used in gene therapy for a while but so far have always induced cancer. There is also the question of why did the beta cells die in the first place. Is replacing them only a temporary work around as opposed to a solution?
I lose confidence in an author (Harvard University?) who says "the first scientist to successfully clone an adult mammal - a frog", or are they referring to a frenchman!
not rated yet Aug 28, 2008
It should be noted that there is already a demonstrated viable solution to replacing/repairing body parts. However it is not ethically permitted with humans (at least here in the USA). Creating a cloned foetus of the patient, harvesting the required cells and transplating them from foetus to patient. This has been done successfully in model animals. Identical twins are natural clones and could transplant some cells ethically so long as the donor consented.
2 / 5 (1) Aug 28, 2008
Note: this fatasic breakthrough was done without killing a foetus OR cloning one.

Of course, googleplex, if we don't concern ourselves with ethics, we could simply harvest organs from our children, relatives, or slaves. Many a concentration camp doctor became famous for overlooking ethics:
not rated yet Aug 29, 2008
I was not suggesting ignoring ethics, on the contrary. Look at how the mainstream press ignores the 100,000s of "fertilized eggs" (embryos) that are thrown into the trash during IVF treatment. Isn't this even worse than harvesting embryos to save another life?

The ethical alternatively is using stem cells from umbillical cord blood.

"...harvesting organs from your children, relatives or slaves." will not work because of tissue rejection. Only a clone fixes the tissue rejection issue.
not rated yet Aug 31, 2008
stem cells don't come from fetuses anyway. they come from an embryo, which is the term used when the conceptus is still a relatively undifferentiated mass of cells up through the fifth week of gestation. (it's just a bad idea to define a "human being" strictly by way of the genome, anyway. more folks need to read immanuel kant!) how many people never realize that more than 60% of conceptions are spontaneously aborted in the first two months anyway; it's like a test drive! if there's something wrong with the embryo, and/or the woman's body disagrees for some reason, then out it goes.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.