Compact galaxies in early universe pack a big punch

Apr 29, 2008
Hubble Studies Compact Galaxies Loaded with Stars
These images taken by the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope show nine compact, ultra-dense galaxies as they appeared 11 billion years ago. The galaxies are only 5,000 light-years across and yet are 200 billion times more massive than the Sun. They are a fraction of the size of today's grownup galaxies but contain the same number of stars. Each galaxy could fit inside the central hub of our Milky Way Galaxy. Hubble's Near Infrared Camera and Multi-Object Spectrometer snapped these images between June 2006 and June 2007. Credit: NASA, ESA, P. van Dokkum (Yale University), M. Franx (Leiden University, The Netherlands), and G. Illingworth (University of California and Lick Observatory, Santa Cruz)

Imagine receiving an announcement touting the birth of a baby 50 centimetres long and weighing 80 kilograms. After reading this puzzling message, you would immediately think the baby’s weight was a misprint.

Astronomers looking at galaxies in the Universe’s distant past received a similar perplexing announcement when they found nine young, compact galaxies, each weighing in at 200 billion times the mass of the Sun. The galaxies, each only 5,000 light-years across, are a fraction of the size of today's grownup galaxies but contain approximately the same number of stars. Each galaxy could fit inside the central hub of our Milky Way Galaxy.

Astronomers used the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope and the W.M. Keck Observatory on Mauna Kea, Hawaii, to study the galaxies as they existed 11 billion years ago, when the Universe was less than 3 billion years old.

“Seeing the compact sizes of these galaxies is a puzzle", said Pieter G. van Dokkum of Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut, USA, who led the study. "No massive galaxy at this distance has ever been observed to be so compact. These galaxies would have to change a lot over 11 billion years, growing five times bigger. They could get larger by colliding with other galaxies, but such collisions may not be the complete answer. It is not yet clear how they would build themselves up to become the large galaxies we see today”.

To determine the sizes of the galaxies, the team used the Near Infrared Camera and Multi-Object Spectrometer on Hubble. The Keck observations were carried out with assistance of a powerful laser to correct for image blurring caused by the Earth's atmosphere. Only Hubble, Keck and ESO’s Very Large Telescope are really able to measure the sizes of these galaxies as they are very small and far away.

Van Dokkum and his colleagues studied the galaxies in 2006 with the Gemini South Telescope Near-Infrared Spectrograph, on Cerro Pachon in the Chilean Andes. Those observations provided the galaxies’ distances and showed that the stars are a half a billion to a billion years old. The most massive stars had already exploded as supernovae.

“In the Hubble Deep Field, astronomers found that star-forming galaxies are small”, said Marijn Franx of Leiden University, The Netherlands. “However, these galaxies were also very low in mass. They weigh much less than our Milky Way. Our study, which surveyed a much larger area than in the Hubble Deep Field, surprisingly shows that galaxies with the same weight as our Milky Way were also very small in the past. All galaxies look really different in early times, even massive ones that formed their stars early”.

The ultra-dense galaxies might comprise half of all galaxies of that mass 11 billion years ago, van Dokkum said, forming the building blocks of today’s largest galaxies.

How did these small, crowded galaxies form? One way, suggested van Dokkum, involves the interaction of dark matter and hydrogen gas in the nascent Universe. Dark matter is an invisible form of matter that accounts for most of the Universe’s mass. Shortly after the Big Bang, the Universe contained an uneven landscape of dark matter. Hydrogen gas became trapped in pockets of the invisible material and began spinning rapidly in dark matter’s gravitational whirlpool, forming stars at a furious rate.

Based on the galaxies’ mass, which is derived from their colour, the astronomers estimated that the stars are spinning around their galactic disks at roughly 400 to 500 kilometres per second. Stars in today’s galaxies, by contrast, are travelling at about half that speed because they are larger and rotate more slowly than the compact galaxies.

These galaxies are ideal targets for the Wide Field Camera 3, which is scheduled to be installed aboard Hubble during Servicing Mission 4 in the fall of 2008.

The findings appeared in the April 10 issue of The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

Source: ESA/Hubble Information Centre

Explore further: What are extrasolar planets?

Related Stories

Supernova ignition surprises scientists

May 20, 2015

Scientists have captured the early death throes of supernovae for the first time and found that the universe's benchmark explosions are much more varied than expected.

Extremely young stellar clump in the distant universe

May 15, 2015

As part of an observing program carried out with the Subaru Telescope and the Hubble Space Telescope, a group of researchers from the Service d'Astrophysique- Laboratoire AIM of CEA-IRFU led by Anita Zanella ...

Hubble catches a stellar exodus in action

May 14, 2015

Using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope, astronomers have captured for the first time snapshots of fledgling white dwarf stars beginning their slow-paced, 40-million-year migration from the crowded center of ...

Astronomers baffled by discovery of rare quasar quartet

May 14, 2015

Using the W. M. Keck Observatory in Hawaii, a group of astronomers led by Joseph Hennawi of the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy have discovered the first quadruple quasar: four rare active black holes ...

Water was plentiful in the early universe

May 13, 2015

Astronomers have long held that water—two hydrogen atoms and an oxygen atom—was a relative latecomer to the universe. They believed that any element heavier than helium had to have been formed in the ...

Recommended for you

What are extrasolar planets?

19 hours ago

For countless generations, human beings have looked out at the night sky and wondered if they were alone in the universe. With the discovery of other planets in our solar system, the true extent of the Milky ...

A curious family of giant exoplanets

19 hours ago

There are 565 exoplanets currently known that are as massive as Jupiter or bigger, about one third of the total known, confirmed exoplanet population. About one quarter of the massive population orbits very ...

Astrobiology students explore alien environment on Earth

19 hours ago

Sonny Harman never thought he'd be able to travel far enough to do field work. That's because the Penn State doctoral student studies atmospheres on other planets. But to his surprise, Harman recently stepped ...

NASA image: Hubble revisits tangled NGC 6240

20 hours ago

Not all galaxies are neatly shaped, as this new NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope image of NGC 6240 clearly demonstrates. Hubble previously released an image of this galaxy back in 2008, but the knotted region, shown ...

User comments : 8

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

earls
4 / 5 (1) Apr 29, 2008
Doesn't sound very far off from TimESimmon's description of galaxy formation... Replacing dark matter with anti-gravity matter, of course.

Seems like the Heavens above are nothing but one large contradiction of physics.
HenisDov
2 / 5 (1) Apr 29, 2008
Singularity and D-Infinity (max expansion/ cosmic energy dilution) are the two cosmic stable states. Their in-between is a metastable state, which is an everyday commonsense observation. Likewise is the observation that the denser the compacting goal of material the more energy is required, and vice versa the more thorough the disintegration of material the higher the amount of energy released. It seems that E=mC^2 is a specific case of the cosmic (and universal) process
E=Total[m(1 plus D)] where D is the Distance from Big Bang point and the sum is of all spatial values of D from D=0 to D=selected value.

BTW, following Newton (1) gravity is decreased when mass is decreased and (2) acceleration of a body is given by dividing the force acting upon it by its mass. By plain common sense, best scientific approach, the combination of those two 'laws' may explain the accelerating cosmic expansion of galaxy clusters, based on the above E/ m/ D suggested relationship.

Thus the young "condensed galaxies" are, in fact, what later evolved into galactic clusters.

Dov Henis
thales
not rated yet Apr 29, 2008
Is "common sense" code for "I'm going to skip this part"?
Arthur_Dent
4 / 5 (1) Apr 29, 2008
Is it possible, that the disappearance of these ultra-compact galaxies is because they got eaten by their central black-hole?

Might "Quasars" be ultra-compact galaxies eating themselves
( hence
a) the absence of such galaxies hereabouts, and
b) the production of "Quasars" only way-back-then
)

'twould solve 2 significant problems with one simple cancellation, yes?
Arthur_Dent
4 / 5 (1) Apr 30, 2008
Actually, there's a third item:

c) This predicts that there are galaxy-mass black-holes, with nothing spinning into 'em
( because there isn't anything left nearby )
littering space, with approximately the same frequency of the ultra-compact-galaxies...

At the old-edge of Universe there'd be quasars & ultra-compact-galaxies,
nearer there'd be a "phase-transition", and nearer there'd be only the black-holes, invisible.

Therefore, some of the "missing mass" would be in these things,
& they should be findable.

Also, that boundary should be findable,
& consistent,
right 'round our Universe.
thales
4 / 5 (1) Apr 30, 2008
I'm pretty sure that the time required a galaxy and central black hole to form, then for all the galaxy's mass to disappear into the black hole, is greater than the current age of the universe.
Arthur_Dent
4 / 5 (1) May 01, 2008
Fine, but
a) that may not apply to ultra-compact galaxies, and
b) there's no rule that prevents the ultra-crowded stars from combining into crowds of black-holes, & them eating the *visible* galaxy out from existence, eventually combining into single black-holes.

You're probably right, however, and considering such questions ought not be done...

: )
Graeme
not rated yet May 06, 2008
I am wondering if this is just a selection bias. The compact galaxies have a much higher surface brightness and can be seen more easily than the more diffuse larger galaxies with the same mass.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.