Study may solve age-old mystery of missing chemicals from Earth's mantle

Dec 05, 2007

Observations about the early formation of Earth may answer an age-old question about why the planet’s mantle is missing some of the matter that should be present, according to UBC geophysicist John Hernlund.

Earth is made from chondrite, very primitive rocks of meteorites that date from the earliest time of the solar system before the Earth was formed. However, scientists have been puzzled why the composition of Earth’s mantle and core differed from that of chondrite.

Hernlund’s findings suggest that an ancient magma ocean swirled beneath the Earth’s surface and would account for the discrepancy.

“As the thick melted rock cooled and crystallized, the solids that resulted had a different composition than the melt,” explains Hernlund, a post-doctoral fellow at UBC Earth and Ocean Sciences.

“The melt held onto some of the elements. This would be where the missing elements of chondrite are stored.”

He says this layer of molten rock would have been around 1,000 km thick and 2,900 km beneath the surface.”

Published in today’s edition of the journal Nature, Hernlund’s study explores the melting and crystallization processes that have controlled the composition of the Earth's interior over geological time. Co-authors are Stéphane Labrosse, Ecole Normale Superieure de Lyon and Nicolas Coltice, Université de Lyon.

The centre of Earth is a fiery core of melted heavy metals, mostly iron. This represents 30 per cent while the remaining 70 per cent is the outer mantle of solid rock.

Traditional views hold that a shallow ocean of melted rock (magma) existed 1,000 km below the Earth’s surface, but it was short lived and gone by 10 million years after the formation of Earth.

In contrast, Hernlund’s evolutionary model predicts that during Earth’s hotter past shortly after its formation 4.5 billion years ago, at least one-third of the mantle closest to the core was also melted.

Source: University of British Columbia

Explore further: Geologists make new discoveries about the Newport-Inglewood Fault Zone in the Los Angeles Basin

Related Stories

A brief history of nukes in space

Jun 26, 2015

In just a few short weeks, NASA's New Horizons spacecraft will make its historic flyby of Pluto and its moons. Solar panels are unable to operate in the dim nether regions of the outer solar system, and instead, ...

Scientists make new estimates of the deep carbon cycle

Jun 19, 2015

Over billions of years, the total carbon content of the outer part of the Earth—in its upper mantle, crust, oceans, and atmospheres—has gradually increased, scientists reported this month in the journal Proceedings of ...

Magnetic complexity begins to untangle

Jun 23, 2015

After a year in orbit, the three Swarm satellites have provided a first glimpse inside Earth and started to shed new light on the dynamics of the upper atmosphere – all the way from the ionosphere about ...

Recommended for you

Monitoring volcanoes with ground-based atomic clocks

5 hours ago

An international team led by scientists from the University of Zurich finds that high-precision atomic clocks can be used to monitor volcanoes and potentially improve predictions of future eruptions. In addition, a ground-based ...

Image: Unusually large number of fires across Alaska

6 hours ago

The fire situation in Alaska is very dynamic at this time. As of June 29, 2015, there are 314 active fires in the State. Many fires in remote areas are unstaffed. The fire summary for Alaska is as follows: ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

brant
1 / 5 (3) Dec 05, 2007
"why the planets mantle is missing some of the matter that should be present,"

Is an assumption that your model accurately represents reality.

Obviously it doesnt.
Time to look at your model instead of forcing some other results to fit your models lacking.
out7x
2 / 5 (3) Dec 06, 2007
Petrology is a major field of study in geology.
Trippy
5 / 5 (1) Jan 24, 2008
Yeah... Imagine the audacity of suggesting that the melted area might have been bigger then previously expected, the sheer nerve of someone suggesting that mixing might have occured in a liquid, and that differential crystalization might actually have occured.

(For anyone who's in doubt - Wiki's page on it http://en.wikiped..._melting )

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.