First-ever 'State of the Carbon Cycle Report' finds troubling imbalance

Nov 14, 2007

The first “State of the Carbon Cycle Report” for North America, released online this week by the U.S. Climate Change Science Program, finds the continent’s carbon budget increasingly overwhelmed by human-caused emissions. North American sources release nearly 2 billion tons of carbon into the atmosphere each year, mostly as carbon dioxide.

Carbon “sinks” such as growing forests may remove up to half this amount, but these current sinks may turn into new sources as climate changes.

“By burning fossil fuel and clearing forests human beings have significantly altered the global carbon cycle,” says Chris Field of the Carnegie Institution’s Department of Global Ecology, one of the report’s lead authors. A result has been the buildup of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, but so far this has been partially offset by carbon uptake by the oceans and by plants and soils on land.

“In effect, we have been getting a huge subsidy from these unmanaged parts of the carbon cycle,” notes Field. Overall, this subsidy has sequestered, or hidden from the atmosphere, approximately 200 billion tons of carbon. In North America much of it has come from the regrowth of forests on former farmland and the uptake of carbon by agricultural soils.

But these carbon sinks may be reaching their limit as forests mature and climate conditions change. And some may literally go up in smoke if wildfires become more frequent, as some climate simulations predict. Planting forests and adopting carbon-conserving practices such as no-till agriculture may increase carbon sinks somewhat, but this would not come close to compensating for carbon emissions, which continue to accelerate.

“There are a lot of good reasons for replenishing our forests and encouraging better agricultural practices,” says Ken Caldeira, another author of the report, also at Carnegie’s Department of Global Ecology. “But if we want to mitigate our impact on the carbon cycle, there’s no escaping the fact that we need to drastically reduce carbon dioxide emissions.”

Source: Carnegie Institution

Explore further: Great Barrier Reef stays on UN watch list

Related Stories

Architects to hatch Ecocapsule as low-energy house

13 hours ago

Where people call home depends on varied factors, from poverty level to personal philosophy to vanity to community pressure. Ecocapsule appears to be the result of special factors, a team of architects applying ...

California farmers agree to drastically cut water use

17 hours ago

California farmers who hold some of the state's strongest water rights avoided the threat of deep mandatory cuts when the state accepted their proposal to voluntarily reduce consumption by 25 percent amid ...

Apple may deliver ways to rev up the iPad, report says

17 hours ago

MacRumors last month said that the latest numbers from market research firm IDC's Worldwide Quarterly Tablet Tracker revealed Apple stayed on as the largest vendor in a declining tablet market. The iPad ...

Recommended for you

Great Barrier Reef stays on UN watch list

5 hours ago

The Great Barrier Reef will remain under surveillance but not be listed as endangered, according to a draft recommendation to the UN's World Heritage Committee, published on Friday.

Food or fuel? How about both?

9 hours ago

In the United States, federal mandates to produce more renewable fuels, especially biofuels, have led to a growing debate: Should fuel or food grow on arable land? Recent research shows farmers can successfully, ...

Using desalination to address drought

9 hours ago

"It's a very interesting time in the water industry," says Carlos Riva '75, CEO of Poseidon Water, a company that is drawing attention as it develops, in Southern California, what will be the largest seawater ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

southernwriter
3 / 5 (2) Nov 14, 2007
380 ppm in the atmosphere is only 38/100,000ths of 1%. It has increased only 80 ppm since the industrial revolution which means that after 100 years of co2 we have only increased by 8/100,000ths of 1%. CO2 has a specific gravity of 1.54 which means that it is 154% heavier than air and sinks to the ground when released. There is massive fraud being perpetrated in this movement/
Arkaleus
1 / 5 (1) Jun 08, 2009
Again the statistical context of human carbon emissions compared to natural carbon emissions is totally omitted. Human activity presents a single digit contribution to the total percentage of carbon released each year.

3-6% of the total emission is in no way a "key" contributor of carbon-caused climate change. It is at best a minor variable, most likely overshadowed by natural variations in the non-human sources. Perhaps they should seek to tax volcanoes and micro organisms, since they are the majority contributors to the world's carbon dioxide emissions.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.