Asteroid heads for Earth, Russian astronomer claims

October 2, 2007

An asteroid discovered three years ago could be a threat in 2029 when it crosses Earth's orbit, a Russian astronomer said Monday.

Boris Shustov, director of the Institute of Astronomy, said at a forum that the Apophis asteroid could have a bigger impact than an asteroid that hit Siberia in 1908, the Novosti news agency reported.

The Tunguska astral event affected 830 square miles and blasted 80 million trees. The force of the impact was about 1,000 times more powerful than the atomic bomb the United States dropped on Hiroshima, Japan, at the end of World War II and measured 5.0 on the Richter scale.

Apophis' predicted track would take it within 17,000 miles of Earth in 2029, Shustov said.

He said if the asteroid proves to be a threat, the Hollywood scenario of destroying it is likely to be more harmful than helpful. Instead, a micro-satellite could nudge it into a safer orbit.

"To blast an asteroid, as some hot shots suggest, is quite an unpredictable step, and a more cautious approach is welcomed now," he said.

Copyright 2007 by United Press International

Explore further: Artificial object in trans-lunar orbit to impact Earth on November 13

Related Stories

What are asteroids?

September 10, 2015

4.6 billion years ago, our solar system formed from a collection of gas and dust surrounding our nascent sun. While much of the gas and dust in this protoplanetary disk coalesced to form the planets, some of the debris was ...

Halloween asteroid a treat for radar astronomers

October 22, 2015

NASA scientists are tracking the upcoming Halloween flyby of asteroid 2015 TB145 with several optical observatories and the radar capabilities of the agency's Deep Space Network at Goldstone, California. The asteroid will ...

What are asteroids made of?

September 14, 2015

What are asteroids made of? Asteroids are made mostly of rock—with some composed of clay and silicate—and different metals, mostly nickel and iron. But other materials have been found in asteroids, as well.

Invest a night in Vesta

October 5, 2015

The brightest asteroid visible from Earth prowls across Cetus the Whale this month. Vesta shines at magnitude +6.3, right at the naked eye limit for observers with pristine skies, but easily coaxed into view with any pair ...

Recommended for you

Earth might have hairy dark matter

November 23, 2015

The solar system might be a lot hairier than we thought. A new study publishing this week in the Astrophysical Journal by Gary Prézeau of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, proposes the existence of ...

The hottest white dwarf in the Galaxy

November 25, 2015

Astronomers at the Universities of Tübingen and Potsdam have identified the hottest white dwarf ever discovered in our Galaxy. With a temperature of 250,000 degrees Celsius, this dying star at the outskirts of the Milky ...

Scientists detect stellar streams around Magellanic Clouds

November 23, 2015

(—Astronomers from the University of Cambridge, U.K., have detected a number of narrow streams and diffuse debris clouds around two nearby irregular dwarf galaxies called the Magellanic Clouds. The research also ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Oct 02, 2007
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
3.5 / 5 (2) Oct 02, 2007
It doesn't matter whether you use a g-tug, use a DEW, spray paint the astroid on one side, or throw a net around it, tie it to a rocket, and try and drag it (heh). Just don't blow the dang thing up.

Talk about going from bad to worse. Then instead of having one or 2 big pieces hitting Earth, you have a million littler pieces, all of which can still do serious damage. The total kinetic energy of the strike is still the same either way.
5 / 5 (1) Oct 03, 2007
Total kinetic energy may be the same, but the idea of blowing it up is so that the smaller pieces can disintegrate in the upper atmosphere.
4 / 5 (1) Oct 10, 2007
What would you rather have poured on you? 1000lbs of pennies from 20 feet or a 1000lbs copper slug?
4 / 5 (1) Oct 11, 2007
Probability. We jaywalk to save a few seconds crossing the street at an unfamiliar intersection. We're phobic about violent crimes which would happen to us less often than winning the state lottery.

Human civilization has been around for thousands of years. So the reason for suddenly looking for objects from space is....? Good news stories? Funding for obscure engineers and scientists looking for a meal ticket?
not rated yet Oct 11, 2007
What would you rather have poured on you? 1000lbs of pennies from 20 feet or a 1000lbs copper slug?

I don't know how big they think the Apophos Asteroid is, but disintegration IS better than a slug. The asteroid in the Armageddon movie was like 500 kilometer diameter, which was very unrealistic even for a nuke to split that size object.

However, a "normal" object of a kilometer or two diameter could be blown apart by a well placed nuke, redirecting most of the material just enough to cause it to miss, and spreading out any residual impacts over a larger area and time.

It is better for many car or building size objects to enter the atmosphere a few at a time over several hours or days, than it is for an object the size of a small mountain to hit all at once. Smaller objects have a greater surface area per unit mass, which makes them burn up in atmostphere easier than a large one.

So the benefit of disintegration is manifold:

1) spread damage out over space and time.

2) burn up more of the object in the atmosphere, reducing the total mass, and therefore force, which reachers earth's surface.

3) Some of the material may miss the earth entirely.

I'll take the pennies because they are more likely to be slowed by air resistance and spread out, and also much of the energy will miss me, whereas a copper slug will hit all at once and smash me to oblivion.
not rated yet Oct 13, 2007
Why not just divert the asteroid just enough so that it hits the moon instead of the earth. No Asteroid that might return one day, no "shot gun" fragments, and no massive resource requirements, as the deflection would be minor, especially if done early. This would also present a great scientific opportunity to study the explosion and resulting lunar crater formation?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.