# A mathematical problem that just doesn't add up

##### May 4, 2007

Most of us share it and it seems a safe enough assumption: mathematical skills and performance develop and advance as students progress through their elementary school years. However, a new study by University of Notre Dame psychologist Nicole M. McNeil suggests that for at least one type of math problem, 7-year-old students are outperforming 9-year-olds.

McNeil analyzed how 7- to 11-year-old children performed on “equivalence” problems. An example of an equivalence problem is: “3+4+5= 3+_.” Previous studies have shown that children have substantial difficulties with mathematical equivalence problems. For example, many come up with solutions for the right side of the equation that range from “3+12” to “3+15.” (For the numerically challenged, the answer is 9.)

“Mathematical equivalence is a fundamental concept in algebra and success in algebra is crucial to future educational and employment opportunities,” McNeil said.

No previous study has specifically examined how equivalence performance develops over the course of elementary school years. However, theories that have focused more generally on the development of students’ quantitative skills assume that children’s difficulties with mathematics are due to something the children lack, such as advanced logical structures, a mature working memory system or proficiency with basic arithmetic facts.

“According to this view, children perform poorly on equivalence problems because they lack the cognitive structures or functions necessary for solving problems correctly, and performance should improve over childhood as those structures or functions develop,” McNeil said.

By contrast, McNeil’s study suggests that children’s difficulties are due, at least in part, to something that they have — existing knowledge. And this existing knowledge promotes “change-resistance” behaviors in students.

“As children learn arithmetic between the ages of 7 and 9, they pick up on at least three, recurrent arithmetic-specific patterns,” McNeil said. “First, they learn that the equal sign and answer blank come together at the end of the problem (3+4=_). Second, children learn to interpret the equal sign as an operator (like + or -) that means ‘calculate the total.’ And thirdly, children learn to solve math problems by performing all given operations on all given numbers.”

Although these patterns likely help performance on traditional arithmetic problems (3+4=_), they do not help, and most likely hinder, performance with equivalence problems, which do not adhere to the traditional form.

“To solve an equivalence problem correctly, children must notice that the equal sign is not at the end of the problem, understand that the equal sign denotes an equivalence relation between the two sides of the equation, and manipulate the numbers and operations to arrive at an answer that makes both sides of an equation have the same value,” McNeil said. “To satisfy these conditions, children must either ignore or override their long-term memory of the operational patterns.”

McNeil conducted two separate studies of 7- to 11-year-olds in Pittsburgh and Raleigh, N.C., schools, respectively, that confirmed that performance on equivalence problems declined between age 7 and 9 before improving between the ages of 9 and 11.

“These findings challenge our intuition and several prevailing theories, but they support change-resistance accounts,” McNeil said.

McNeil points out that similar results have been found for Canadian children, but interestingly enough, not for those in China.

“In the United States, children’s early mathematics experience is heavily weighted toward arithmetic operations such as addition, subtraction, multiplication and division,” McNeil said. “Children learn arithmetic in a very procedural fashion for many years before they learn to reason about equations as expressions of mathematical equivalence.”

McNeil’s research paper appears in the May edition of the American Psychological Association journal Developmental Psychology.

Source: University of Notre Dame

Explore further: Notre Dame paper examines how students understand mathematics

## Related Stories

#### Notre Dame paper examines how students understand mathematics

May 27, 2015

It's both the bane of many parents and what has been called a major national vulnerability: the inability of many children to understand mathematics. Understanding that problem and developing strategies to overcome it is ...

#### Notre Dame psychologist developing new math learning strategies

January 20, 2012

What do children know about mathematics before they start learning it in school? How do external factors like language, education and culture affect children’s understanding? What is the best way to structure an environment ...

## Recommended for you

#### Long-sought discovery fills in missing details of cell 'switchboard'

July 22, 2015

A biomedical breakthrough published today in the journal Nature reveals never-before-seen details of the human body's cellular switchboard that regulates sensory and hormonal responses. The work is based on an X-ray laser ...

#### Supercomputers surprisingly link DNA crosses to cancer

June 19, 2015

Supercomputers have helped scientists find a surprising link between cross-shaped (or cruciform) pieces of DNA and human cancer, according to a study at The University of Texas at Austin (UT Austin).

#### Scientists find evidence for 'chronesthesia,' or mental time travel

December 22, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- The ability to remember the past and imagine the future can significantly affect a person's decisions in life. Scientists refer to the brain’s ability to think about the past, present, and future as ...

#### Machine Translates Thoughts into Speech in Real Time

December 21, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- By implanting an electrode into the brain of a person with locked-in syndrome, scientists have demonstrated how to wirelessly transmit neural signals to a speech synthesizer. The "thought-to-speech" process ...

#### What is 'Real'? How Our Brain Differentiates Between Reality and Fantasy

March 23, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- Most people can easily tell the difference between reality and fantasy. We know that characters in novels and movies are fictitious, and we also understand that historical figures - even if we’ve never ...

#### Quantum Theory May Explain Wishful Thinking

April 14, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- Humans don’t always make the most rational decisions. As studies have shown, even when logic and reasoning point in one direction, sometimes we chose the opposite route, motivated by personal bias or simply ...